<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pros and Cons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prosandcons.us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prosandcons.us</link>
	<description>Conservative thought, liberally applied.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There Was One . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/11/and-then-there-was-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/11/and-then-there-was-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[. . . well, two . . . well, really, three.&#160; But let&#8217;s face it, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul don&#8217;t count. As anybody with a Twitter account, Facebook account, television, radio, or ears knows by now, Rick Santorum has suspended his presidential campaign.&#160; &#8220;Suspended&#8221; is shorthand for &#8220;seen the writing on the wall.&#8221; The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/11/and-then-there-was-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/06/good-friday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/06/good-friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[29 Then they led Jesus from Caiaphas into the Praetorium, and it was early ; and they themselves did not enter into the Praetorium so that they would not be defiled, but might eat the Passover. 29 Therefore Pilate went out to them and said, &#8220;What accusation do you bring against this Man ?&#8221; 30 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/06/good-friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As the Primary Marches On . . . and On . . . and On .</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/04/as-the-primary-marches-on-and-on-and-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/04/as-the-primary-marches-on-and-on-and-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney swept the three primaries held yesterday, to nobody&#8217;s surprise.&#160; The only state in any serious doubt was Wisconsin&#8217;s primary, which Romney won by 35,000 votes (5%).&#160; As expected, Santorum did well in Wisconsin&#8217;s religious and conservative rural areas, but couldn&#8217;t overcome Romney&#8217;s popularity in the state&#8217;s urban and suburban centers.&#160; Maryland was always assumed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/04/as-the-primary-marches-on-and-on-and-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Education Puzzle</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/03/384/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/03/384/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I&#8217;ll admit that I&#8217;m not the sharpest tool in the shed, and I&#8217;m confused.&#160; We continually hear from the doomsayers that American education is going downhill, that we rank middle-of-the-pack in the world, above average for reading literacy, but below average for math and science skills.&#160; We also are below average for graduation rates. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/03/384/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Law Review</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/03/obamas-law-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/03/obamas-law-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who have never been to law school may not be familiar with the concept of a law school&#8217;s law review.&#160; A law review is a particular law school&#8217;s periodical, normally published by a student-run editorial board, and containing scholarly works on legal subjects.&#160; The more prestigious the law review, the more prestigious [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/03/obamas-law-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Several Dead in Classroom Shooting</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/several-dead-in-classroom-shooting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/several-dead-in-classroom-shooting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This from Fox News: DEVELOPING: At least five people are reported dead in a shooting at a small Christian university during which a gunman walked into a classroom and opened fire. Authorities said a possible suspect is in custody and that the area is now secure. They did not give a motive. Authorities said earlier [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/several-dead-in-classroom-shooting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran and Sanctions</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/iran-and-sanctions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/iran-and-sanctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The common complaint heard among many conservatives concerning Iran is that we continue to impose sanctions, instead of resorting to a military option.&#160; That&#8217;s usually about as far as it goes&#8212;exactly what military option we should pursue, and when and how and with whom, are inconvenient details which are usually lost in the greater complaint [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/iran-and-sanctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One on AIDS</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/369/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/369/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I posted about Rick Santorum and pornography.&#160; On the off chance that I have any readers left, I am again going to step off where angels fear to tread. If you read that previous post, I mentioned Rich Galen, who writes a blog (and sends me an e-mail three times a week) called [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/04/02/369/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum&#8217;s Porn Indecency</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/03/28/santorums-porn-indecency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/03/28/santorums-porn-indecency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O.k., I&#8217;m going to lose half of my followers with this one&#8212;I think my mother will still read, though she may not speak to me anymore. According to Rich Galen, who writes a blog called Mullings, Rick Santorum had at one time posted on his campaign web page a position paper which contained this astonishing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/03/28/santorums-porn-indecency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staying Away in Droves</title>
		<link>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/03/28/staying-away-in-droves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/03/28/staying-away-in-droves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prosandcons.us/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an article entitled &#8220;&#8217;Nice Guys&#8217; Finish Last&#8221; last Tuesday (March 20th), James Taranto makes the following opening observation: One advantage an incumbent president has when seeking re-election is that he has already persuaded many voters to cast a ballot for him. That means a challenger&#8212;or the incumbent himself, by doing a lousy job&#8212;has to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prosandcons.us/2012/03/28/staying-away-in-droves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

