Pros and Cons

Conservative thought, liberally applied.

He’s Still Done . . . uh, Doner . . . More Done?

1 Comment »

You can’t say I didn’t call it.

From CNN.com

Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain told supporters Saturday that he is suspending his presidential campaign, which has become hobbled in recent weeks by allegations of sexual harassment and an Atlanta woman’s claim that they carried on a 13-year affair.

While he will still be able to raise and spend campaign funds because he did not officially drop out, Cain’s White House bid is effectively over.

Cain said he came to the decision after assessing the impact that the allegations were having on his wife, his family and his supporters.

[snip]He repeatedly called the allegations “false and untrue,” and added that “the (media) spin hurts.”

“I am not going to be silenced and I will not go away,” Cain said, announcing what he called his Plan B: A website, TheCainSolutions.com, through which he will continue to advocate for his platform.

His catchy “9-9-9” economic plan is not going anywhere, he said.

[snip]

He will endorse another of the Republican presidential hopefuls soon, he said.

[snip]Recently, Cain acknowledged that Ginger White’s allegations of an affair have led to a drop in campaign contributions, and a Des Moines Register poll showed his support among likely Republican Iowa caucus-goers has fallen to 8%, down from 23% in October. The poll has a sampling error of plus or minus 4.9 points, the newspaper said.

Respondents said they were most concerned that Cain does not understand important issues, but said the allegations against him contribute to their concern, the newspaper said.

[snip]Cain’s announcement came a month before the Iowa caucuses, the first formal test of the primary season, scheduled for January 3.

New Hampshire Republican officials who supported Cain began to survey their options Saturday, with several state representatives saying their support could go to Gingrich or Ron Paul. Cain’s most prominent supporter in the state, former GOP state party chair Jack Kimball, said he would wait to learn who Cain would endorse before making his own decision.


A few thoughts:

  1. I told you so.

  2. He was right that his “9-9-9” plan is not going anywhere.  It never was.  It was DOA.  But it did serve the useful purpose of forcing the other candidates to discuss in particular how they would reform the tax code.

  3. Of course, many or most of Cain’s supporters will switch to whomever he endorses—which should be interesting.  But from a political standpoint, I suspect Gingrich will benefit the most.  Ron Paul will get a few Cain supporters, but ideologically they are not sufficiently alike to generate much cross-over.  Actually, much of Cain’s appeal stemmed from the fact that he is a Beltway outsider.  Now, however, from a practical standpoint, his supporters will have to choose between two insiders (and yes, Romney is an insider).  In that respect, I think most Cain supporters will recognize Gingrich to be more radical, and thus more appealing, than Romney.  His remaining supporters obviously have little problem with the sexual politics involved, which means that Gingrich’s three marriages is unlikely to trouble them.  But if, as the poll suggests, they are concerned about Cain’s ability to understand and tackle important issues, then Gingrich should fit that bill perfectly, as he has demonstrated a superior understanding of the issues, beyond even Romney’s substantial grasp.

All of which is to say, the field is finally narrowing, and the next month or two should be interesting to say the least.

Oh, and for those of you confused about what it means to “suspend” a campaign (I was), my understanding is that a campaign cannot close up shop until the Federal Elections Committee tells it that it can close up shop.  That won’t happen until all bills are paid, and other matters are wrapped up.  As a result, the campaign can actually keep raising money and paying bills and generally operating business as usual, but the candidate will presumably quit campaigning, and is effectively out of the race.  Here’s the explanation from Rich Galen at Mullings.com:

Two well-respected Republican campaign attorneys – Michael Toner and Cleta Mitchell – both said over the weekend that the word “Suspend” has no legal meaning in U.S. Federal election law.

Toner told MSNBC that the term is a political one, not a legal one. Mitchell said Cain appears to have “used that term as a ‘soft landing’ exit.”

In fact, a campaign can’t “terminate” without the permission of the Federal Election Commission. Hillary Clinton’s campaign committee from 2008 is still active because the FEC will not allow a campaign to terminate until all its debts are paid, and Clinton’s have not been.


Hillary Clinton’s campaign committee is still active, huh?  Hmmmm . . .

If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Join ‘Em!

No Comments »

French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are leading the charge for a wholesale re-write of European Union treaties to establish and enshrine fiscal discipline in the euro zone.  In support of such an establishment, they are proposing closer political and economic ties, which would ensure the future of a unified Europe.

It is interesting to observe that a mere seventy years ago, Germany annexed/invaded/otherwise acquired Austria, Sudetenland, Bohemia, Moravia (Czechoslovakia), Memel (part of Lithuania), Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, The Netherlands (Holland), Luxembourg, France, Greece, Yugoslavia (Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia), Soviet Union (Russia – part only, Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia), and Egypt

Compare that list to a list of the current 17 eurozone countries:  Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain.

I have emphasized the common countries for ease of comparison between the two lists.

This article on CNN.com is revealing:
Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy both said last week that a fiscal pact should be written into the EU treaty so that budget rules can be properly enforced through broader oversight and automatic penalties for nations that fail to comply.

Sarkozy and Merkel were meeting in Paris on Monday to discuss ways to safeguard the euro by increasing economic and political “convergence.”

“Europe needs to be rethought,” Sarkozy said. “It must be redesigned.”


Now before I start getting nasty e-mail, let me state for the record that I don’t think Merkel and Sarkozy are maliciously trying to “conquer” Europe a la (pardon the pun) 1938.  You can put away your tin foil hats.  I do, however, find it interesting that there is a very real discussion of, not just economic, but political convergence and “rethinking” and “redesigning” of many of the very same countries who spilled native blood in their struggle to maintain their autonomy less than a century ago.

You can put your tin foil hats back on now.

First, for the Important Stuff

No Comments »

Auburn will play Virginia in the Chik-Fil-A Bowl in Atlanta on December 31st.

In other college football news, LSU beat Georgia to win the Southeast Conference championship, and will play for the BCS national championship.  There can be no question that LSU has the best team in the nation, based on record, strength of schedule, and actual performance on the field, crazy coach notwithstanding.

What is interesting is that there is also really no question that Alabama has the second-best team in the nation.  I have not seen anybody really disputing that.  What they are disputing is whether Alabama should get a chance to play LSU for the national championship, rather than, say, Oklahoma State.  The question boils down to this: should the BCS give Alabama a second shot at LSU.

The answer is: of course not.

That’s not to say that Alabama should not have a shot at the national title.  It’s simply to say that the BCS should not decide such things.  In a sane world, a playoff scheme would determine who makes it to the final game, and Alabama and Oklahoma State have both earned a right to play in such a post-season playoff.  But, unfortunately, the BCS is the system we have (for no rational reason that I can discern).  And the BCS system states that the #1 team plays the #2 team for the national championship.  The rules don’t say anything about who wins their conference, or who has already played and beaten who.  It’s 1 and 2.  Period.  Don’t like it?  Call the BCS.

Look, we all know, and have known for years, that the BCS is fatally flawed.  Remember 2004, when unbeaten Auburn was denied the right to play for the national championship?  The game wound up being played by Oklahoma and USC, and it was a farce (Oklahoma didn’t even show up, and it was a rather boring game, after which everybody except Oklahoma fans agreed that Auburn would have give USC a better game).  There have been several years since when the standings, particularly based on win-loss records, have come down the wire, leaving us breathless with anxiety as to who should be in what bowl.  Remember unbeaten TCU?  Granted, it has added an interesting dynamic to the game, sometimes requiring a degree in advanced statistics to figure out who will rank where, and who will be eligible for what.  But, in the end, it doesn’t leave us at the end of the season satisfied that we know who the best team in the country is.  Which is, I believe, the point of a national championship.

I, for one, am thrilled about the re-match.  We will see the two best teams (ranked #s 1 and 2) slug it out on the field (despite winning it’s conference, I don’t think Oklahoma State can hold a candle to either Alabama or LSU).  Experience in other sports (i.e. the NFL) tells us that re-matches rarely mirror the initial match-up, so don’t expect this to be another 9-6 in overtime.  In fact, this is a rare blessing: the opportunity to see a reprise of two juggernauts battling it out for the whole enchilada.  The sequel should be even better than the original, which was some of the best football I’ve seen in a long time.  What will be interesting is if the Tide beats the Tigers.  That will leave the fans really wondering who the best team is!

Geaux Tide!